Consulting home
our services
market sectors
knowledge
careers
DNV.com
about us
contact us
find us
careers
sitemap
DNV UK Homeconsultingnews
news
 
 
"A good strategy makes clear the types of risks a company can assume to its own advantage, the magnitude of the risks it can bear, and the returns it demands for bearing them," says director in DNV Consulting, Magne Tørhaug.
"The survey has identified focus areas for the further implementation of enterprise risk management on the Norwegian Continental Shelf," says project manager Inger-Marie Sannerud

DNV’s definition of enterprise risk management:
"Enterprise risk management is a cross disciplinary approach to identify and manage opportunities and threats in relation to defined company objectives to create value for stakeholders as an integral part of the core business activities and processes across all business units."
Assuming risks, reaping rewards

DNV Consulting has carried out a survey among 17 top managers (CEOs, MDs and CFOs) of operators and licence holders in the North Sea regarding enterprise risk management. Here are some of the key findings.

“We see that all respondents are actively seeking risks in the traditionally strong risk management areas of the oil and gas industry, i.e. in exploration and field development; and we see some strong practices of managing finance and market risks,” says Magne Tørhaug, director in DNV Consulting.

“However, many participants in our study confirm that their focus is more on avoiding mistakes than on capturing opportunities. Risk management is usually perceived as a loss prevention mechanism or as part of a defensive strategy. Now that access to new acreage is the most important business driver, a more aggressive risk strategy is vital,” he says.

Most companies have enterprise risk management in place. The survey shows that:

  • - Nearly 90% of the companies have a risk management policy in place
  • - Most companies have defined risk categories and methods for addressing risk
  • - Close to 90% of the respondents strongly believe that it is acceptable to voice risks in their organisation and have used risk assessments to stop unacceptable activities
  • - Improving decisions and value creation is the prime reason for undertaking enterprise risk management implementation - not pure compliance

Reality, however, kicks in:
Getting a real overview of a vast and complex oil and gas company and the risks it faces is tough. Making it comprehensible, manageable and actionable is even tougher. Ensuring that the organisational set-up facilitates decision making at the right levels is crucial to manage the link between operational risks and strategic risks.

Some difficulties:
The survey shows some elements that are difficult:

  • 1 in 4 companies have not established arenas and fora for treatment of risk pictures
  • 1 in 3 companies report that operational risks influencing strategic goals are not escalated adequately throughout the organisation
  • 70% of the companies have a risk register but only 65% present their risk picture to their Board of Directors and only 55% to other stakeholders
  • Half of the companies interviewed are not satisfied with their implementation of risk management and more than half of the respondents see obstacles to enterprise risk management implementation in their organisation

Here, Shell Norway’s Managing Director, Johan Nic. Vold shares his experiences with enterprise risk management in practice.



19 December 2005
SEARCH
SHORTCUTS
Services overview
Enterprise Risk Management
SHE Risk Management
Operations Excellence
IT Risk Management
Project Examples
RELATED INFO
  links:
Enterprise Risk Management
  contacts:
Magne Tørhaug e-mail
Remi Eriksen e-mail
Inger-Marie Sannerud e-mail
  downloads:
ERM Survey 2005
   
top of page

print this page

print this page
privacy statement | © 2008 det norske veritas | terms of use